Categories:
September 30, 2007
Return of the Tree Hating Neighbor
As mentioned in a previous post, I have been corresponding with my neighbor's attorney, Mr. James G. Wiard, about my river birch (Betula nigra). In my response to his initial letter I declined to trim the tree. I made it clear that if the neighbors feel compelled to destroy the aesthetic appeal of the tree through excessive pruning, they must not overstep their legal rights while doing it.
Today I received another letter from Mr. Wiard. He indicates that a professional tree trimmer has been engaged to prune branches overhanging his clients' property. Now they are requesting permission to have access to my property so that they can cut even more of the tree. The request is presented in the guise of attempting to do the pruning properly. If I were to approve such access the tree would surely lose a large portion of its crown. While collar cuts are the proper method to use when pruning trees, I fear what these ignorant people would request of the tree trimmer if he had access to the trunk. My only defense at this point is to keep their tree trimmer off my property and force them to make lateral cuts further from the trunk. In this manner, the tree trimmer may be able to appease their thirst for innocent sap, while still maintaining some of the tree's symmetry.
The sad thing is that there is no way I can make these people understand that their actions are pointless. The trees in my yard will continue to follow their natural cycles despite any disfiguration that they may inflict upon on the one. There will still be pollen, seeds and leaves blowing in the wind and I will be glad to see it, for it means that nature is still surviving despite mankind's attempts to defeat it.